← All case studies

Case study 6 · Knowledge transfer through feedback and mentoring

Shared standards. Local capability.

Global engineering · APAC

  • Silos slow delivery
  • Knowledge held by senior experts
  • Dependence on travelling support teams
Photographic concept of an engineering workspace connecting design knowledge and teams across regions
Photographic concept · Expertise shared across regions.

The engagement at a glance

Before & after.

Reported results

Reported results

Team assessment

BeforeAfter
  • Communication

    Before
    After
  • Relationships

    Before
    After

The bars compare team-assessment scores before and after the engagement. What do the five measures mean?

Before The starting point

Expertise was not reaching the team consistently.

APAC teams in a global engineering business were struggling to consistently meet the design standards expected by their UK colleagues. The knowledge-transfer gap called for better feedback and mentoring. Senior engineering leaders and business support staff were travelling to the region for extended periods to troubleshoot problems, putting the emphasis on triage rather than building local capability.

After Reported after

Better feedback. Shared learning. Less troubleshooting travel.

Communication increased from 27% to 63%, and relationships from 31% to 58%. The business also reported lower spending on extended troubleshooting visits by senior engineering leaders and business support staff.

Changes in practice

The starting need and the changes reported.

  • Communication
    Before

    Teams needed clearer, more frequent feedback to understand and apply design expectations.

    Reported after

    Communication rose from 27% to 63% alongside a shared leadership language and solution-focused feedback.

  • Relationships
    Before

    Knowledge transfer needed a more consistent approach to mentoring across regions.

    Reported after

    Relationships rose from 31% to 58%, supported by mentoring cohorts and regular development conversations.

  • Business impact
    Before

    Senior engineering and business support staff travelled for extended periods to troubleshoot problems.

    Reported after

    Spending on those visits fell as the work focused on developing regional capability.

01

What we did

Inspired helped leaders and teams establish a shared leadership language, give frequent, solution-focused feedback and develop mentoring cohorts. The focus was on transferring engineering knowledge through everyday conversations and ongoing development.

  1. Make the expectations shared

    A common leadership language helped leaders and teams discuss design expectations, explain where work needed to improve and make development conversations clearer across regions.

  2. Make feedback frequent and useful

    The emphasis was on regular, solution-focused feedback: explaining the gap, helping people understand what good work required and focusing on what to do next.

  3. Build mentoring cohorts

    Mentoring cohorts supported the ongoing transfer of knowledge and experience, giving leaders and engineers a shared approach to developing capability.

02

The business impact

Less was spent sending senior engineering leaders and business support staff to APAC for extended periods to triage problems. Frequent feedback and mentoring supported a shift towards building capability within the regional teams.

Applying this to your team

Start by agreeing the behaviour you want to change, the situations in which it matters and how you will review progress. We can use examples from your current work to shape the engagement and establish a useful starting point.

Discuss a similar challenge